Lawrence v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. Circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to authorize á finding that a defendant accused of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants was guilty of the offense although no witness testified positively to having seen him operating the vehicle. Where a police officer comes upon the defendant standing beside his wrecked automobile which has skidded off the road and into a ditch, who admits he was the driver of the vehicle, is unsteady on his feet, talks incoherently, is unable to explain the details of the single-vehicle accident, and reeks of alcohol,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Fountain v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Joiner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Brent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Steed v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- New v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Chance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.