Legal Opinion

Holland v. Zollne

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1894No. 15281PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Seaels, C.

This is an action to have a deed declared fraudulent and' void, and that it be set aside, annulled, and declared of no effect. Plaintiff had a decree in her favor, from which, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the defendant Alfred Zollner appeals.

The plaintiff and Henry Holland intermarried at the city and county of San Francisco on the sixteenth day of July, 1885, prior to which time plaintiff was a widow and the mother of four children, of whom the defendant Alfred Zollner is one. On the second day of February, 1891, Alfred Zollner obtained from Henry Holland a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. De Witt v. . Barly and SchoonmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. People v. LavelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. ArrighiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API