Legal Opinion
State v. Mobley
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 28, 1993No. File 6-337571PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The principal issues in this proceeding, in which the state claims that the defendant violated the terms of her probation, are whether the sentencing judge imposed treatment for alcohol abuse as a condition of the defendant’s probation and, if not, whether the defendant’s probation officer could and did do so. This court concludes that (1) no condition of probation was imposed by the sentencing judge, (2) the condition of alcohol abuse evaluation and treatment was imposed by the defendant’s probation officer, (3) such a condition constitutes medical treatment within the ambit of General…
2Cases cited129 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. MobleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. LockhartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In Re Amber S., (June 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002