Legal Opinion
Gaspar v. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 14, 2006No. 24225-1-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
128 P.3d 627 (2006)
Daniel GASPAR, Appellant,
v.
PESHASTIN HI-UP GROWERS, a Washington Corporation, Respondent.
No. 24225-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
February 14, 2006.
Scott M. Kane, Attorney at Law, East Wenatchee, WA, for Appellant.
Lewis W. Card, Attorney at Law, Wenatchee, WA, for Respondent.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
¶ 1 Daniel Gaspar filed a complaint against his former employer, Peshastin Hi-Up Growers, for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. He contends he was terminated for assisting a police investigation at his work place. The trial court dismissed his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Protect the Peninsula's Future v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.