Appolos v. Brady
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the United States Court in the Indian Territory. Action by J. B. Brady, D. C. Brady, and W. H. Brady, commenced by attachment, against A. M. Means and J. S. B. Appolos, intervener. Verdict and judgment sustaining the attachment. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Shiras, District Judge.
The defendants in error brought an action at law in the United States court in the Indian Territory against A. M. Means to recover the amount due upon a draft drawn upon and accepted by him, and caused a writ of attachment to be issued and levied upon certain articles of personal property. The defendant below traversed the facts relied upon as grounds for the issuance of the attachment, and one J. S. B. Appolos intervened in the cause for the purpose of asserting his rights to the attached property, based upon a written instrument executed to him as trustee, and which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richmond v. Mississippi MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Robson v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Penzel Co. v. JettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Lincoln v. FieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Raleigh v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frick Co. v. OatsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- National Live Stock Commission Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In re Thomlinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- American Surety Co. v. Carbon Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- In Re RangelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.