Shubert v. State

WEIER, Judge.

Movant Mitchell Jay Shubert appeals from a denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. Pursuant to Rule 27.26, V. A.M.R., movant had alleged that he was denied an adequate psychiatric examination and a competency hearing as provided by § 552.020, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. As a result, he asserted that his constitutional rights were- violated. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and denied the relief sought without a hearing. We affirm.

In 1971 movant faced several criminal charges which included,…