Legal Opinion

Durham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1975No. 36146PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

Appeal from an order denying appellant’s Rule 27.261 motion to vacate judgment of conviction entered on a guilty verdict of statutory rape and to set aside the thirty-five year sentence imposed under the provisions of the Habitual Criminal Act, § 556.-280, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. Appellant contends: (1) he was subjected to double jeopardy; (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that his lawyer was ignorant of the law controlling psychiatric examinations on the issue of mental competence and failed to request a second examination to determine appellant’s fitness for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. State v. DurhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Durham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. State v. IrvingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Tillman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. SalesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API