Legal Opinion
Brizendine v. Swenson
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 11, 1969No. 1394PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
I
The state prisoner involved in this case invokes the habeas corpus jurisdiction of this Court for a second time. In Brizendine v. Swenson (W.D.Mo.1966), 261 F.Supp. 68, we dismissed petitioner’s first application for federal habeas corpus because petitioner had not then exhausted his available state court post-conviction remedies. Following that decision petitioner filed a pro- se Missouri Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. motion in the state trial court. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the denial of that motion in State v. Brizendine (Mo.Sup.Ct.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. McArthur Edwards, AKA Edwards McArthur and Charles Darnell WardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Maggard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.