People v. Lloyd Winston G.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
In People v Coleman (43 NY2d 222) we held that an order directing a defendant to appear in a lineup was " 'sufficiently "judicial” in nature, not unlike arraignment or the issuance of an arrest warrant, so that a right to counsel exists at "critical stages” held after that order is issued’ ” (id., at p 225 quoting *964from People v Sugden, 35 NY2d 453, 461). Hence, appellant had the right to the presence of counsel at the lineup, the denial of which requires suppression of the identification made at that time.*
Inasmuch as the error is of constitutional magnitude, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. SugdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BuxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. McMooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.