Legal Opinion

People v. Lloyd Winston G.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1978PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

In People v Coleman (43 NY2d 222) we held that an order directing a defendant to appear in a lineup was " 'sufficiently "judicial” in nature, not unlike arraignment or the issuance of an arrest warrant, so that a right to counsel exists at "critical stages” held after that order is issued’ ” (id., at p 225 quoting *964from People v Sugden, 35 NY2d 453, 461). Hence, appellant had the right to the presence of counsel at the lineup, the denial of which requires suppression of the identification made at that time.*

Inasmuch as the error is of constitutional magnitude, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. SugdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. BuxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. McMooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API