Legal Opinion

Brubaker v. Hatjimanolis

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1949No. 31247. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crampton

Defendants-appellants are husband and wife, as, likewise, are plaintiffs-appellees. A decree was entered in the circuit court of Stephenson County against the defendant husband in an action for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate to plaintiffs. An appeal was taken to the Appellate Court for the Second District; it was transferred to this court because a freehold is involved. Miller v. Pettengill, 392 Ill. 117; Lewis v. McCreedy, 378 Ill. 264.

The plaintiffs-appellees filed their action in July, 1946, to have a warranty deed they gave to defendant George Hatjimanolis…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Coryell v. KlehmIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Seely v. RoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Douglas Lumber Co. v. Chicago Home for IncurablesIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Anderson v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Freymark v. HandkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Laegeler v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Halla v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lovins v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re Estate of BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API