Legal Opinion

Seely v. Rowe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1938No. 24862. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

Mary Adams, a spinster aged eighty-three, died in Los Angeles, California, on June 17, 1936. By her will she gave a large part of her estate to her nephew, David A. Seely, and her nieces, Addie Plunkett, and Kate Washburne, who were her only heirs-at-law. On June 19, 1936, appellant, Marcus W. Rowe, filed in the recorder’s office of Whiteside county, Illinois, a deed which purported to convey to Rowe 302 acres of land in that county and which reserved a life estate to the grantor, Mary Adams. On June 29, 1936, her heirs filed their complaint in the circuit court of Whiteside county to set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roby v. ColehourIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Northern Trust Co. v. SanfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mors v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Masterson v. WallIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Poole v. City of KankakeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Illinois Rockford Corp. v. KulpIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Layton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Vargas v. Esquire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API