Haywood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The State’s testimony showed that defendant enticed prosecutrix and her little brother into defendant’s restaurant, closed the doors, and had sexual intercourse with prosecutrix in a closed room in the restaurant. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was convicted of rape on a girl under fifteen years of age and given a life sentence in the penitentiary.
1. Several questions are presented for revision which we deem unnecessary to discuss. The matter with reference to summoning, the jury may not occur upon another trial. This matter is set out in bill of exception No. 1.
2. In bill of exception No. 2 it is urged that parties not authorized to be before the grand jury while they were deliberating upon finding the bill, were present. We are of opinion the evidence on this question does not show such to be a…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Stern v. State Ex Rel. AnselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- McGregor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Black v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.