Legal Opinion

Black v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1931No. 8 Div. 391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The prosecution of this appellant, by indictment, was for an alleged violation of the offense denounced under section 5411 of the Code 1923, which makes it unlawful for any person to have carnal knowledge of a girl over the age of twelve and under sixteen years; or abuses such girl in the attempt to have carnal knowledge of her. The provisions of this section .of the Code do not apply to boys under sixteen years of age.

The first count of the indictment in this case contained the unnecessary averment that the accused was a boy over the age of sixteen years. This is defensive matter, and it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Holmes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Haywood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Battles v. TallmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  3. Halford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Harrison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Turner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API