Legal Opinion

McGregor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1918No. 4873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

Appellant’s conviction was for keeping a bawdy house. A motion to quash the indictment was made, and the evidence heard on the motion preserved. The motion asserts that unauthorized persons were with the grand jury during its deliberations touching the indictment. The evidence taken is too long to give in detail. It appears that the grand jury, while in session, had under consideration the subject of bawdy houses for a couple of days. During this time there was before the grand jury on the subject Mr. Allen, the sheriff; Mr. Snow, chief of police; Mr. Jackson, an attorney; Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Haywood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stern v. State Ex Rel. AnselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Euresti v. Valdez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  5. Euresti v. Valdez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API