Legal Opinion

Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 2001No. A090680PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAY, J.

Can staring at a fellow employee—“to gaze fixedly . . . with eyes wide open,” is how the Oxford English Dictionary defines the word— constitute actionable sexual harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) (FEHA)? We hold that under the circumstances disclosed by the record in this case, such conduct may indeed violate FEHA’s proscription on gender-based harassment in the workplace. Whether it does or does not amount to harassment as a matter of fact is a determination for the trier of fact in later proceedings; here, we decide…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Reeves v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Joseph v. J.J. Mac Intyre Companies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  5. Kelley v. The Conco Cos.California Court of Appeal · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API