Casey v. Casey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The issue presented in this appeal is whether an equitable distribution award is a money decree or a judgment, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 34-31-20 (1987), so that it accrues interest at the statutorily prescribed postjudgment rate of 14%. We see no reason to distinguish equitable distribution money awards from other money judgments. Accordingly, we reverse the family court’s denial of postjudgment interest of 14%.
FACTS
The parties were divorced by family court order dated August 30, 1983. The decree provided for the equitable distribution of the parties’ property. Pursuant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Jacobs v. AMER. MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. OF CHARLESTONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Dick v. DickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Shaw v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In Re AubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Thornton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Hunting v. EldersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Edwards v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.