Legal Opinion

Casey v. Casey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 1993No. 23822PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether an equitable distribution award is a money decree or a judgment, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 34-31-20 (1987), so that it accrues interest at the statutorily prescribed postjudgment rate of 14%. We see no reason to distinguish equitable distribution money awards from other money judgments. Accordingly, we reverse the family court’s denial of postjudgment interest of 14%.

FACTS

The parties were divorced by family court order dated August 30, 1983. The decree provided for the equitable distribution of the parties’ property. Pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Jacobs v. AMER. MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. OF CHARLESTONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Dick v. DickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Shaw v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re AubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Thornton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Hunting v. EldersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Edwards v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API