Legal Opinion

Casey v. Casey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 12, 1987No. 22783PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari was granted in this divorce case to review the decision of the Court of Appeals reported at 289 S. C. 462, 346 S. E. (2d) 726 (Ct. App. 1986). We reverse.

Petitioner (Husband) and respondent (Wife) were married in 1960. In 1976, Husband purchased a retail fireworks business from his father and has operated it as a sole proprietorship. Wife worked in the business until 1980. The continued success of the business can be attributed largely to Husband’s lobbying efforts to keep the sale of fireworks legal in South Carolina.

At the. time of the divorce, the tangible assets of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Nail v. NailTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Casey v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Rgm v. DemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Dickert v. DickertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Keane v. Lowcountry Pediatrics, P.A.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API