Rosano-Davis, Inc. v. Sastre
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The defendants, Marcos Sastre (“Sastre”), Rosa M. Sastre, and Rosa M. Sastre, trustee of Tiara 34C Realty Trust (‘Trust”), appeal pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, the trial judge’s denial of their motion for involuntary dismissal and his subsequent finding in favor of the plaintiff, Rosano-Davis, Inc. (“Rosano-Davis”), on a quantum-meruit theory. The issue is whether the landowner Trust on the facts here may properly be held liable for paying the bills of the subcontractor Rosano-Davis when the general contractor had not fully done so. For the reasons set out below, we find…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Evans v. Multicon Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Community Builders, Inc. v. Indian Motocycle Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LFS Group, Inc. v. GutzlerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011