Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Limited Express, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-576PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, District Judge.

This removal action, before this Court pursuant to diversity jurisdiction, presents us with a Motion for Summary Judgment by defendants, Limited Express, Inc. (Limited) and Jayne L. Sainer (Sainer). On February 19, 1988, plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants 1 alleging slander, slander by compelled self-publication, and assault and battery.

Plaintiff, a former employee of Limited, contends that Limited and Sainer are liable for slander because Sainer, plaintiffs supervisor at Limited, accused plaintiff of the theft of Limited’s funds totalling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bonnie Susan Polsky v. Radio ShackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Molush v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Gresh v. Potter McCune Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Leibowitz v. H.A. Winston Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bals v. VerduzcoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Nardella v. Dattilo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1997
  4. GRANDE v. STARBUCKS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. M.T. v. UNIONTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API