Legal Opinion
GRANDE v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 8, 2021No. 2:18-cv-04036-GEKPUnknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES C. GRANDE, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff : v. : STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al., No. 18-4036 Defendant : MEMORANDUM <h PRATTER, J. OcTOBER ¥Y ___,2021 The law does not punish all perceived indignities. James Grande, a patron of Starbucks, claims that the coffee shop cleaned too close to him. He also accuses the coffee shop of tampering with his drinks. His first complaint is not a legal wrong. For the second, he provides no proof. So his claims cannot go to trial. The Court thus grants Starbucks’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.