Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bolduc

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 23, 1990No. 88-P-1377PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a dogbite case. Gail Brown, the victim, aged thirty-two at the time of the accident, brought her action against Sonia Bolduc, aged twenty-nine, and Sonia’s parents, Jacqueline and Daniel Bolduc. Upon trial, Gail had a verdict and judgment against Sonia on the basis of the dogbite statute, G. L. c. 140, § 155, as amended by St. 1968, c. 281, set out in the margin.2 At the close of her case against the parents claiming negligence as well as breach of the statute, the judge directed a verdict for the parents, and Gail takes her appeal from the judgment against her.

On February 27, 1983,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Malchanoff v. TruehartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Maillet v. MininnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Boylan v. EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Splaine v. Eastern Dog Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eric Gross and Adrianne Gross v. Elizabeth Turner and Antonio FloresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. Audette v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Neztsosie v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Salisbury v. FerioliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Irwin v. DegtiarovMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API