Legal Opinion

Maillet v. Mininno

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff was bitten by a dog. G. L. c. 140, § 155, provides: “The owner or keeper of a dog shall be liable in tort to a person injured by it in double- the amount of damages sustained by him.” She brought action, thereunder, against Agostino Mininno and his wife Rachele; and declared against them in'one count alleging that “the defendants were the owners or keepers” of the dog.

Had the defendants demurred, such a declaration must have been declared to be bad. It was decided in Galvin v. Parker, 154 Mass. 346, that the owner and the keeper of a dog are not liable jointly and severally as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boylan v. EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Galvin v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Murphy v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Rhinehart v. RhinehartWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Canavan v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Brown v. BolducMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Maglio v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API