Legal Opinion
Carballo v. 444 East 87th Street Owners Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 18, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Big Z Builders, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, *527from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated July 31, 2003, as, upon granting the motion of the respondents 444 East 87th Street Owners Corp. and Arco Management Corp. which was to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 on the plaintiffs causes of action to recover damages under Labor Law § 200 and for common-law negligence, directed the entry of a judgment in their favor and against it on the issue of indemnification.
Ordered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jock v. FienNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ferrero v. Best Modular Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Martinez v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 2006