Legal Opinion
Jock v. Fien
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1992PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.
The injured plaintiff, an employee of Van Petty Excavating, Inc., fell from an upright steel mold that he was preparing during his customary occupational work of fabricating a concrete septic tank (see, 176 AD2d 6, 7-8, for detailed recitation of facts). The accident happened in a building owned by defendant Fien and leased to defendant Van Petty, whose business included the manufacture of septic tanks.
*967The injured plaintiff and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bland v. ManocherianNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Vernieri v. Empire Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Yong Ju Kim v. Herbert Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Perchinsky v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.