Legal Opinion

Hershman v. Muhlenberg College

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-7639PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

STENGEL, District Judge.

Seth Hershman brings this action against Muhlenberg College, his alma mater, asserting violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Currently pending is the defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, I will dismiss the NIED claim. Otherwise, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Seth Hershman, plaintiff, is a former student of Muhlenberg College, defendant. In November 2010, Mr. Hershman began to suffer from depression and sought treatment at the college’s counseling office. The depression…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. MDB v. Punxsutawney Christian Sch.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. LaLoup v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Ahmad Williams, Malaika Williams v. Thumbtack, Inc., A-G Eagle Construction LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Alfrey v. WhitleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. DOE v. THE HILL SCHOOLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API