Legal Opinion
Alpine Bank v. Hubbell
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 2, 2007No. CIVA05CV00026EWNPACPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
EDWARD W. NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.
This is a deed foreclosure and breach of contract case. Plaintiff Alpine Bank (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or the “Bank”) alleges that Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Platt T. Hubbell and Kelley S. Hub-bell defaulted on a promissory note to Plaintiff without justification, entitling the Bank to recovery. Defendants, in turn, allege: (1) their default is excused because Plaintiff breached the contract between them; (2) Plaintiff committed the torts of negligent misrepresentation and non-disclosure; and (3) Plaintiff…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- LaSalle Bank Nat'l Assoc. v. Paramont PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008