W. S. Huselton & Co. v. Durie
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Upon demurrers by Annette Durie to cross-bills of Bisig, Schwarz, and Bieh & Co.
1Opinion of the Court
Garrison, V. C.
The separate cross-bills are practically, and for the purposes of this decision actually, identical, and will be dealt with as if one.
They aim to reach real estate which- — or the proceeds of the sale of which — John Durie was entitled to under his mother’s will, and which real estate he caused the executors of his mother’s will, who had the title and the power to convey it, to convey to him and his wife.
The cross-complainants contend that as to them the wife holds *438as a trustee. They plead judgments against the husband, but do not allege the date of the deed, or that executions…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cohen v. DwyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Duncan v. LauryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Belmont Lumber Co. v. FriedmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Dloss Realty Corp. v. Schultz Brewing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Robinson v. HodgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947