Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Dwyer

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 27, 1943No. Docket 149/232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whatever may be the style of the disguise, equity adapts its remedial or corrective decrees to the essential and substantive nature of the transaction. A judgment at law in the sum of $4,220 has been obtained by the complainant against the defendant Rose K. Dwyer. The complainant seeks a decree appropriating to the payment of his judgment an equitable interest ostensibly acquired by the defendant Rosda Corporation, in a residential property occupied by the judgment debtor and known as No. 614 Linden Avenue at Woodbridge, New Jersey.

An auxiliary purpose of the bill is to obtain discovery in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  2. Garford Trucking, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Ross v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  4. Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  5. Trachman v. TrugmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller & Dobrin, Etc., Co. v. CAMDEN FIRE, ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Yacker v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Cohen v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. State v. SingletaryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Baker v. JosephsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API