Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Robison

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1938No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from a judgment for defendant in ejectment and turns on the construction of section 16 of the Intestate Act governing devolution from an adopted person.

The defendant, Mary H. Robison, had three children by her first husband, William Robison, also named as a defendant but not served. She was divorced from him January 28, 1901. On April 3, 1901, she married Dr. D. E. Fisher. January 24, 1906, she deserted Dr. Fisher, who obtained a decree of divorce for desertion on that date. On January 21, 1906, 1 before the desertion, Dr. Fisher, by decree of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cave's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Russell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Morgan v. ReelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Peterson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Hadley's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of HolibaughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Oelberman Adoption CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API