Legal Opinion

Russell's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1925No. Appeal, 221PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Testator died without leaving lineal descendants. One paragraph of his will says: “I give and bequeath unto my niece, Sarah Booth, the sum of $2000.” Similar pecuniary gifts, in varying amounts, are made to other relatives, and his residuary estate is directed “to be divided among the above named legatees pro rata.” Mrs. Booth died before testator, without descendants, but leaving to survive her an adopted son, the appellant here. For the purposes of this appeal, we will assume, without deciding the point, that the deed by which he was adopted, is sufficient to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Puterbaugh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Yates's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Spangler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Schafer v. EneuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  5. Fluke v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cryan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Commonwealth v. Girard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Cave's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Holton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API