Legal Opinion

Matthew C. McKinnon v. Terry Redden

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 13, 2026No. 3:21-cv-00573Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MATTHEW C. MCKINNON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-CV-573 JD TERRY REDDEN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Matthew McKinnon, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. (DE 308.) “[A] preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” Mazurek v. Armstrong,

520 U.S. 968, 972

(1997) (citation omitted). To obtain a preliminary injunction, the moving party “must establish that he is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Lackey v. StinnieSupreme Court of the United States · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API