Legal Opinion
In Re Capital Underwriters, Inc. Securities Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided January 18, 1979No. 356PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
This litigation consists of nine actions pending in three federal districts: three in the Northern District of California (Mendelsohn, McDonald and Wheeler); four in the District of New Jersey (Jala I, Jala II, Johnson and Francis); and two in the District of Hawaii (Batey and Carter). The claims in each action arise out of alleged fraudulent conduct in the sale of limited partnership interests in one or more real estate projects marketed by Capital Under writers, Inc., its affiliates and representatives, and/or the alleged misuse of funds received in the sale of these…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- In Re Republic National-Realty Equities Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Griseofulvin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- CONSUMERS DISTRIBUTING CO. LTD. v. Tele-Save Merchandising Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- In re Food Fair Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979