Legal Opinion

Paddock v. Brisbois

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1929No. Civil No. 2798PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action grew ont of the administration of the civil service of the city of Phoenix, and involves the construction of its charter, an ordinance passed under its charter, and the rules and regulations as formulated thereunder by the Civil Service Commission.

The appellees, Greorge O. Brisbois, chief of police, James H. Allen, night captain of police, and Edwin C. Moore, desk sergeant and clerk of the police, were, on March 8, 1928, by written orders assigning reasons therefor, dismissed from the service by the city manager. They were all in the classified civil service, and accordingly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Balcom v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. People ex rel. Gullett v. McCulloughIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Brundage v. BrundageNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Trapp, State Auditor v. Cook Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. West v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Phoenix v. SittenfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kendall v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. City of Phoenix v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API