Legal Opinion

Weems v. Little Rock Police Department

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2006No. 05-1152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

Donald Weems and Michael Briggs, registered sex offenders living in Arkansas, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They challenged provisions of the Arkansas Sex Offender Registration Act that require sex offenders to register with the State as well as a criminal statute that prohibits certain registered sex offenders from living within two thousand feet of a school or daycare center. The district court 1 granted defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim and denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. We affirm.

I

In 1997, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SenoglesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  2. Weems v. Little Rock Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Burchette v. Sex Offender Screening & Risk Assessment CommitteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Students for Sensible Drug Policy Foundation v. SpellingsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API