Legal Opinion

Dezerene v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Respondent moves for leave to file a peSition under the 56th Admiralty Rule of the Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, to bring in Frank P. Nendza as a party respondent.

This suit in Admiralty was commenced June 5, 1944, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by a seaman due to the negligence of the respondent which owned, or chartered, or for whose account the vessel upon which the libelant was employed, was operated. The libel alleges:

“That by reason of the negligent failure of the respondent, its agents, servants and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Central Argentine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  4. The M. L. C. No. 10Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mandel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Rich v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API