Rich v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, Chief Judge.
Rich was an employee of Pyrate Tank Cleaners, Inc., and at the time of the injury complained of was engaged in the work which that corporation was performing upon the S.S. “William Crompton”, then owned by the United States. Thereupon Pyrate paid him compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act of 1927, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., for about 28 weeks, at the expiration of which time, Rich elected to sue a third party, 33 U.S.C.A. § 933, and subsequently brought this libel against the United States.
The United States now moves for leave to amend its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Porello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Erie Railroad v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Golden Valley Electric Ass'n v. City Electric Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Golden Valley Electric Ass'n v. City Electric Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974