Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unani*534mously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: This appeal by plaintiffs and additional defendant the Pillsbury Company is limited to Special Term’s denial of their motions for leave respectively to amend the complaint and cross claim to assert a cause of action declaring null and void a supplemental agreement dated December 30, 1981 between defendants and Aireo, Inc. and others. The dispute is no stranger to this court (see, Airco Alloys Div. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 65 AD2d 378, 76 AD2d 68; Bethlehem Steel Corp. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 93 AD2d 983; Bethlehem Steel Corp.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Airco Alloys Division, Airco, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Airco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API