Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Airco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order which (1) granted respondents’ motion for permission to intervene in plaintiffs’ action seeking a mandatory allocation of hydroelectric power to plaintiffs; (2) amended the title of plaintiffs’ action to reflect respondents’ status as intervenors; and (3) permitted the interposition of the answers of such intervener defendants.

*1061Respondents have shown a proper basis for intervention. The action in which they sought intervenor status is one involving disposition or distribution of property (CPLR 1012, subd [a],…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. MATTER OF CAVAGES, INC. v. KetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampton Heights Development Corp. v. Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Dissolution of Karl Springer Woodworking, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API