Legal Opinion

Hofto v. National Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1925No. 19169. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— Appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment by default. The respondent has not appeared in this court. Appellant’s motion to vacate shows that it has a meritorious defense to the action.

Within, a proper time after service of process, the defendant demurred to the complaint. Thereafter the demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff filed a first amended complaint, against which the defendant moved. This motion has never been disposed of, and after it was made, the plaintiff served and filed a second amended complaint. The defendant at no time moved against, demurred to or answered this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richman v. Wenaha Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Molloy v. Union Transfer, Moving & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tiffin v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Gage v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Mueller v. GarskeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. McKinlay v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API