Hofto v. National Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
— Appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment by default. The respondent has not appeared in this court. Appellant’s motion to vacate shows that it has a meritorious defense to the action.
Within, a proper time after service of process, the defendant demurred to the complaint. Thereafter the demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff filed a first amended complaint, against which the defendant moved. This motion has never been disposed of, and after it was made, the plaintiff served and filed a second amended complaint. The defendant at no time moved against, demurred to or answered this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richman v. Wenaha Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Molloy v. Union Transfer, Moving & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tiffin v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Gage v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Mueller v. GarskeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- McKinlay v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1933