Legal Opinion

McKinlay v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 4, 1933No. 20818Published

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.'

■Plaintiff moves to remand on the ground that the petition and bond for removal were not served or filed within the time required by the statute of the state of Washington or rules of its courts for the defendant to answer to the complaint of the plaintiff.

The summons and complaint were served on the 30th day of June, 1933.

In so far as material to the present question, civil actions in the state of Washington are commenced by the service of the summons (Remington’s Revised Statutes of Washington, § 220), which summons is directed to the defendant, requiring him to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hofto v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API