Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Garske

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 1, 1969No. 23-40172-1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

The King County Superior Court quashed an order which directed respondents Gregory Garske and wife (hereinafter called Garske) to appear for examination in a supplemental proceeding. William Mueller, the creditor, appeals.

On August 24, 1962, Mueller commenced an action in Snohomish County for an accounting of partnership assets, Neither fraud nor the wrongful withholding of funds were alleged. Garske filed a general denial on September 24, 1962. On August 13, 1963, he also filed a petition in bankruptcy which listed Mueller as a creditor.

Garske failed to attend the trial. Mueller’s attorney…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Markley v. MarkleyWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Matthias v. Lehn & Fink Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Falkner v. FoshaugCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Falkner v. FoshaugCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Columbia Valley Credit Exchange, Inc. v. LampsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. King v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Raymond v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API