Legal Opinion

Barras v. Barras

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1916No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Iron; Flannigan, J. Ejectment by Alpha C. Barras against Sarah J. Barras and another. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

(after stating the facts). It seems that Edwin P. Barras, the father, wrote various letters regarding the land in question, after he had signed and acknowledged the deed to his daughter, the defendant, and after its alleged delivery. In these letters he spoke of the land as his own, and gave directions as to its management. • It is unnecessary to determine in this case whether these letters would, or would not, have been competent evidence if they had been written without defendant’s knowledge. It was fairly shown that she did have a general knowledge of her father’s correspondence about the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dawson v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Hagerman v. WigentMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Blanchard v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. RosaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Collins v. LamotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mossman v. Millenbach Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Camp v. Guaranty Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API