Legal Opinion

Painter v. Town Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 26, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.

The question of law here involved is whether the plaintiff, as supervisor of the town of Oyster Bay from January 1, 1926, to December 31, 1929, is personally entitled to the one per centum on moneys paid out by him from the proceeds of sewer and water bonds, under sections 237 and 288 of the Town Law, during his tenure of office. These percentages were audited and allowed by the town board, but the plaintiff has deposited them in a special account, desiring a judicial determination as to whether the statute gives this one per centum to him individually, or merely in bis representative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fowler v. BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Clary v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Ex parte Harrington & Hubbell v. Trustees of the Village of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  4. People v. StollNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Price v. . County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate HerleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. Lunceford v. Fegles Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on HudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API