Legal Opinion

Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on Hudson

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWitschief, J.

It is claimed on behalf of the plaintiffs that, in the disposition made of these cases, the court overlooked the application of section 2 of the Village Law and failed to apply the provisions of that section to section 348 of the Village Law.

Section 2 of the Village Law provides that a territory not exceeding three square miles or conforming to the boundaries of a water district, lighting, fire or school district, or an entire town, or two school districts containing in each case a population not less than 250 and not including a part of a city or village may be incorporated as a village…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. People Ex Rel. Scharff v. . FrostNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Abell v. . ClarksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Travis v. American Cities Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Richards v. ScharmannNew York Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People ex rel. Village of Spring Valley v. SchroederNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Village of Saranac Lake v. GillispieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API