Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on Hudson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWitschief, J.
It is claimed on behalf of the plaintiffs that, in the disposition made of these cases, the court overlooked the application of section 2 of the Village Law and failed to apply the provisions of that section to section 348 of the Village Law.
Section 2 of the Village Law provides that a territory not exceeding three square miles or conforming to the boundaries of a water district, lighting, fire or school district, or an entire town, or two school districts containing in each case a population not less than 250 and not including a part of a city or village may be incorporated as a village…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People Ex Rel. Scharff v. . FrostNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Abell v. . ClarksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Travis v. American Cities Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Richards v. ScharmannNew York Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- People ex rel. Village of Spring Valley v. SchroederNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Village of Saranac Lake v. GillispieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1938