Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 2009No. SC 18075Published

1ConcurrenceSchaller, J.

I agree that the plaintiff homeowners, Gerald Hees and Beatrice Hees, are not entitled to recover damages for their costs to complete and repair the work performed by the defendant, Burke Construction, Inc. I disagree, however, with the decision to reverse the judgment on the basis of an interpretation of the Home Improvement Act (act), General Statutes § 20-418 et seq. I would reach the same result by a more direct route that does not involve any statutory interpretation of General Statutes § 20-429 (a), which provides in relevant part that “[n]o home improvement *18contract shall be valid or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Woronecki v. TrappeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. New England Custom Concrete, LLC v. CarboneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API