Legal Opinion

Tuska, Son & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 22, 1911No. 692PublishedCited by 2 opinions

,Appeals from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 25543 (T. D. 31589), and Abstract 25835 (T. D. 31675).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The protests here relate to an article referred to in the record as toy shamrocks, sometimes as artificial shamrocks: • They were classified and assessed for duty as artificial leaves under paragraph 438 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, the material part of which is as follows:

438. * * * Artificial or ornamental feathers, fruits, grains, leaves, flowers, and stems or parts thereof, of whatever material composed, not specially provided for in this section, sixty per centum ad valorem. * * *

They are made of silk and metal, having in addition in some instances a miniature clay pipe or hat…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Anglo-American Commodities v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API