United States v. Anthony Caicedo (95-3242) William A. Ryan (95-3513)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
The principal question in this case is whether subsequent actions of police officers converted what began as a consensual encounter into unlawful “seizures” of two individuals under the Fourth Amendment. The search for an answer to this question requires a rather detailed statement of facts related to the entire encounter.
I
A
On August 11, 1994, Officer John E. Mercado of the Cincinnati, Ohio police force was assigned to drug interdiction duty at the Greyhound Bus Terminal in Cincinnati. He was in full uniform and was armed. Officer Mercado testified 1 that he noticed a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- United States v. Randy GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Christopher FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- State v. CartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- United States v. Albert WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Alex HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.