Legal Opinion
United States v. General Dyestuff Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Defendants demur to the indictment and move to quash it. The indictment is in two counts. The first charges a violation of Section 1 of the Anti-Trust Act, Act of July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1; the second charges a violation of Section 73 of the Wilson Tariff Act, Act of August 27, 1894, c. 349, 28 Stat. 570, 15 U.S.C.A. § 8.
Under count 1 the' indictment charges that:
“Beginning on or about May 14, 1924, and continuing at all times thereafter including the three years next preceding the date of the filing of this indictment, the defendants and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Distillers Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- United States v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. PezetelDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.