Legal Opinion
United States v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 3, 1949No. 24214PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREED, District Judge.
The instant action was brought by the United States under favor of Section 4 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4, to prevent and restrain the continuing violations of Sections 1 and 3 of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 3. Permanent injunction with adequate protection to prohibit the violations is sought.
The complaint charges, that the defendant and the co-conspirators entered into contracts, agreements and understandings to eliminate competition between themselves and with others, in the manufacture and sale of anti-friction bearings in all the markets of the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.