Legal Opinion

Ross Stores, Inc. v. Redken Laboratories, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1991No. D-0858PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an equitable bill of discovery proceeding under rule 737, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Redken produces hair care and beauty products and sells them through distributorship agreements by which the products may be sold for resale only to professional salons or licensed cosmetology schools. Redken discovered Ross was selling genuine Redken products at highly competitive “discount” prices. Ross is not a licensed Redken distributor, and its stores do not have professional beauticians or barbers or otherwise qualify as contemplated resale outlets under the Redken distributorship…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. State ex rel. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. IFS Security Group, Inc. v. American Equity Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  3. Thomas v. Fitzgerald, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  4. In re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. in Re Mike East, Alice East, Lisa East and Alejandro Urias, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API